Visual Studio 2010 Beta2 says "The application cannot start."

We have been having this issue with Visual Studio 2010 Beta2. It just stops loading. For some it stops loading unless you load it via loading a solution, others it's the opposite.

We can't move to the RC2 until we it supports Silverlight 4 properly..

The solution?

We have had some success by just loading up a visual studio command prompt and running:
devenv /ResetSettings

UPDATE:
Also try:
devenv /reset
devenv /resetuserdata


Give it a go. Let me know how you get on :)
(It might also be worth backing up your currentsettings.xml file first)

accepts_nested_attributes_for and sti

I have a site that lets you create child entities on the create form for the aggregate root. Thanks to accepts_nested_attributes_for this isn't too hard.

accepts_nested_attributes_for :kids, :allow_destroy => true

The problem I hit was mixing this with single table inheritance. When the child node is for a derived class, it saves without the 'type' information being set.

It seems the accepts_nested_attributes only creates new instances of the generic base class entity, which then ignores the value passed to the 'type' field.

I ended up doing this work around to get it to replace #new on the base class with an implementation that returns the correctly typed derived instance when the hash passed includes a 'type' field.

Thanks to Coderrr for posting this work around.

Note: I've backed up the code to http://gist.github.com/273858

Insert multiple word documents into another.

Just thought I would share this quick macro I wrote for our test team to let them join a bunch of documents together in word..

http://gist.github.com/190041

It's just simple enough to work.

Pit:: Manages your user config settings easily.

Pit is a real 'gem' of a gem.

I have a script that installs a bunch of gems to set up a development environment on rails. The problem is each user of the script needs to set up the proxy for their own specific user settings. I don't want to store that information in the script as everyone would be logged in as me. I don't want to have to remember to manually set up some config file for each user of the system either.

Pit acts like a repository for configuration data. In your code, just ask Pit for specific data and it will either return the known information OR prompt the user with an editor so they can fill in the missing information (which is then remembered). So simple!..

Install: gem install pit

Usage:

   require "pit"
   config = Pit.get("proxy.settings", :require => {
           "username" => "default value",
           "password" => "default value"
   })

Install the gem and run gem server for more information.

The files are hosted at http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=4607

Thanks LowReal whoever you are!

StoryQ

I've been looking at BDD with .Net recently. I'm evaluating a few story runners... There seem to be a few...

• NBehave
  
• NSpecify
  
• StoryQ
  
• NSpec
  
• Spec#
  
• MSpec
  

It's still early days, so I haven't decided on a library yet.

One possibility is the StoryQ story definition library. It isn't a runner, but uses your existing test runner as you define your specs within a test.


[Test]
public void ExecutorRunsTests()
{
var story = new Story("Running a test script");

story.AsA("tester")
.IWant("to run a test script")
.SoThat("I can verify the release meets the acceptance criteria")

.WithScenario("A passing test script")
.Given(() => ThereIsATestFileWithASinglePassingTest())
.When(() => TheTestIsRun())
.Then(() => TheTestPassShouldBeReported())
.And("report no failures or errors")

.WithScenario("A failing test script")
.Given(() => ThereIsATestFileWithASingleFailingTest())
.When(() => TheTestIsRun())
.Then(() => TheTestFailureShouldBeReported())
.And("report the failure")

.WithScenario("An erroring test script")
.Given(() => ThereIsATestFileWithASingleErroringTest())
.When(() => TheTestIsRun())
.Then(() => TheTestErrorShouldBeReported())
.And("report the error")
;
story.Assert();
}


The Statements can be written as Given(() => ThereIsATestFileWithASingleErroringTest()) or .Given("There is a test file with a single erroring test")

This allows you to start by defining them as strings and later go back and introduce the code. This makes the development feel bite sized and focused.

To help with this I wrote a simple VBA Macro to convert from text to a lambda method. It also converts back, but it's not perfect as ToUpper is a lossy operation, but it's good enough.

You can grab the macros here.